More penalties against CFMMEU, union official and contractor

More penalties against CFMMEU, union official and contractor

The Federal Court has found the CFMMEU, its South Australian State Secretary, and a contractor engaged in an unlawful picket in October 2019 during construction of the $27 million East Terrace Apartments.

In evidence before Federal Court Justice John O’Sullivan, a group of at least 30 people, some wearing clothes embossed with CFMMEU banners and waving union flags, gathered outside the front gate of the site. The protest was linked to a commercial dispute between a South Australian owned and operated subcontractor, Core-Form, and the head contractor on the project.

Core-Form had been contracted to supply and construct formwork at the project. Following a dispute between the parties, Core-Form alleged they were owed a sum of $180,000 for work done at the site and, as a result of not being paid, had been forced to lay off workers.

In an unusual occurrence, the director of Core-Form, and a union official approached the site gate on 1 October 2019, during which the director demanded the return of tools, equipment and a container that he claimed remained on site. His request was denied.

On 16 October 2019, a crowd, including the director and the CFMMEU State Secretary, gathered at the front entrance. The director was wearing union-branded clothing and was in possession of a red union flag. Members of the crowd held up signs with phrases including,


Some of the protesters used a megaphone to lead other protesters in various chants, including:

“Pay your bills! Pay your bills! Pay your bills! Pay your bills, Joe!”; “Sell your Porsche”; “Sell the car”; and “What do we want? Bills paid! When do we want it? Now!”.

Other incidents that occurred during the protest included:

  • Yelling at a female Trades Assistant, “where’s your boots?”; “where’s your hard hat?”, “get off site”; and “where are your safety boots”; over about a five-second period, as well as chanting “pay your bills”; “joe’s a grub, grubby, grub, grub” over about a 15-second period.

  • Preventing a vehicle driven by a painting contractor from entering the site, thereby delaying the delivery of painting supplies for over 19 minutes.

In determining appropriate penalties, Justice O’Sullivan noted, “This is the fifth time Mr Sutherland has engaged in behaviour which contravenes industrial legislation”.

He imposed a penalty on the official amounting to $38,000 and a penalty of $189,000 on the CFMMEU.

He further imposed penalties of $25,000 on the director, and $132,000 on the contractor, Core-Form, noting, “In all the circumstances, I find the contravening conduct by Mr Sneath and by Core-Form was objectively serious”.

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The 250 East Terrace Case) [2022] FCA 760 (1 July 2022)

For questions about industrial action, union right of entry, or other employment questions, please contact Dean Cameron at Workforce Advisory Lawyers – We Know Employment Law on 0417 622 178, 1300 WAL LAW or via email to

Disclaimer: This information is provided as general advice on workplace relations and employment law. It does not constitute legal advice, and it is always advisable to seek further information regarding specific workplace issues. Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

Related Articles

Workforce Advisory Pty Ltd ACN 625359980 Phone 1300 925 529, 07 3607 3850 Email
Liability limited by a Scheme Approved under Professional Standards Legislation

@Copyright 2018 to 2023 Workforce Advisory Pty Ltd